JG Pasterjak
Tech Editor & Production Manager
5/28/25 9:27 a.m.
The G87 M2 is in danger of eclipsing the G82 M4 as BMWs top performance coupe. The most interesting thing to watch will be which car cannibalizes sales from the other one. It's kind of crazy that BMW has two cars in their lineup of such similar appeal and performance. I'm trying to think of another example of it and without resorting to picking SUVs or family sedans it's tough. Maybe when Ford had a Mustang and a Maverick in the same lineup?
The CS looks great. The trouble with all the special BMW M models is the price. $100k is knocking on a lot bigger competitors than the base version. A c8 z06 isn't that far off. And you could also do a lot to a base car for $30k. I guess its a lot easier to have a m2cs as your only car than a z06.
JG Pasterjak said:
The G87 M2 is in danger of eclipsing the G82 M4 as BMWs top performance coupe. The most interesting thing to watch will be which car cannibalizes sales from the other one. It's kind of crazy that BMW has two cars in their lineup of such similar appeal and performance. I'm trying to think of another example of it and without resorting to picking SUVs or family sedans it's tough. Maybe when Ford had a Mustang and a Maverick in the same lineup?
i thought the M4 was all wheel drive only making it likely a bit more appealing for those folks that want a car to use year round.
Looks good! Which is more than a can say for most new BMWs. I still don't understand how it weighs that much. Like how much more does an M4 weigh?
And I had no idea BMW build cars in Mexico, wow!
To your question, doesn't the higher end Caymen stack up pretty closely to some "lower" 911s? I don't know the prices though (not my world).
ClearWaterMS said:
JG Pasterjak said:
The G87 M2 is in danger of eclipsing the G82 M4 as BMWs top performance coupe. The most interesting thing to watch will be which car cannibalizes sales from the other one. It's kind of crazy that BMW has two cars in their lineup of such similar appeal and performance. I'm trying to think of another example of it and without resorting to picking SUVs or family sedans it's tough. Maybe when Ford had a Mustang and a Maverick in the same lineup?
i thought the M4 was all wheel drive only making it likely a bit more appealing for those folks that want a car to use year round.
I thought that was the M5?
I haven't looked because it's not like I can afford a new BMW anyway.
I believe the M3/4 are now also AWD. And I don't know why I know that as they are way too expensive for me too.
CyberEric said:
I believe the M3/4 are now also AWD. And I don't know why I know that as they are way too expensive for me too.
Went to their website, it looks like you can buy them in RWD or AWD. The regular M3 and M3 Comp in RWD, or the M3 Comp in AWD.
In reply to CyberEric :
My 23' Cayman GTS would be a good comparison.. better handling with mid engine- just under 400 Naturally aspiration horses makes all the difference
That is an incredibly capable car. It's interesting to compare it to a 911. It's a bit faster than a 2025 Carrera and just a hair behind the Carrera S, which is a whole lot more expensive!

JG Pasterjak
Tech Editor & Production Manager
5/28/25 3:31 p.m.
dyintorace said:
That is an incredibly capable car. It's interesting to compare it to a 911. It's a bit faster than a 2025 Carrera and just a hair behind the Carrera S, which is a whole lot more expensive!

Throw a $400 tune on the BMW and suck the headlights out of that Carrera S, too.